6 Comments
Jan 21, 2022·edited Jan 21, 2022

The clinical evidence from South Africa, Israel, and the UK contradicts this study.

And the author of the study points out that the case data were not from a random, double blind study where there are no confounding factors. From one of the study authors:

"Denmark was very quick to conduct sequencing and to identify the first generations of Omicron cases in the country. Cases during this period occurred to an exaggerated extent in those who were travelling internationally, and those in the social and professional circles of travellers, and were largely vaccinated. We expect therefore that there was an overrepresentation of vaccinated people among the first generations of Omicron cases identified in Denmark, not because the vaccines weren’t protective, but because the variant hadn’t spread far enough into the general population, including into the unvaccinated population, to make for comparable infection rates.”

Expand full comment

Curious, why does the Danish study conclude with "In light of the exponential rise in Omicron cases, these findings highlight the need for massive rollout of vaccinations and booster vaccinations."?

Expand full comment